Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2015] ZAGPJHC 300

State v Krejcir and Others (SS26/2014)

State v Krejcir and Others (SS26/2014) [2015] ZAGPJHC 300 (14 April 2015)

The court found that the evidence accused 2 sought to introduce was new and relevant to the determination of the admissibility of his statement. Section 167 of the Criminal Procedure Act empowers the court to recall any witness, including an accused, if such evidence is essential to a just decision. The court determined that there was no procedural prejudice to the State that outweighed the interests of justice. The recall of accused 2 was necessary to ensure all relevant facts were before the court, and the application was granted.

  • Recall Of Witness
  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 167
  • Trial Within A Trial
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.