Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2023] ZASCA 83

Raymond Daniel de Villiers v S (996/2021)

Raymond Daniel de Villiers v S (996/2021) [2023] ZASCA 83; 2023 (2) SACR 221 (SCA) (31 May 2023)

The Supreme Court of Appeal set aside a compensation order made on appeal and remitted the matter to the regional court for sentencing afresh.

  • Compensation Order
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 300
  • Sentencing Discretion
  • Restorative Justice
  • Criminal-procedure-act-section-300
  • Compensation-order
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2015] ZAECGHC 69

S v Ngceni (CA&R: 176/2015)

S v Ngceni (CA&R: 176/2015) [2015] ZAECGHC 69 (7 July 2015)

The High Court confirmed a fraud conviction and sentence, but set aside a section 300 compensation order because the prosecutor lacked instructions from the injured person.

  • Fraud
  • Compensation Order
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 300
  • Sentencing
  • Restitution
  • Compensation-order
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2013] ZAECGHC 3

S v Velaphi (2012000329)

S v Velaphi (2012000329) [2013] ZAECGHC 3 (1 January 2013)

The magistrate erred in applying section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Act to award compensation to the buyer of the stolen cows. The section requires that the application for compensation be made by or on behalf of the person who suffered loss or damage as a result of the offence. In this case, the complainants (owners of the cows) did not suffer loss, as their property was returned. The buyer, who suffered the monetary loss, was not the complainant and there is no evidence that the prosecutor was instructed by him to apply for compensation. Furthermore, the amount awarded (R9,200) exceeded…

  • Stock Theft
  • Compensation Order
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 300
  • Innocent Purchaser
  • Magistrates Court Award
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2010] ZAGPJHC 94

S v Khoza (61/0960/2009)

S v Khoza (61/0960/2009) [2010] ZAGPJHC 94; 2011 (1) SACR 482 (GSJ) (20 October 2010)

High Court review of a theft conviction held that the compensation order was procedurally defective, but the conviction stood and sentence was set aside.

  • Compensation Order
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 297
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 300
  • Sentencing Review
  • Theft
  • Compensation-order
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2005] ZAGPHC 312

S v Mahlangu and Another (A1228/2005)

S v Mahlangu and Another (A1228/2005) [2005] ZAGPHC 312 (22 August 2005)

The High Court confirmed a theft conviction but set aside a compensation condition attached to a suspended sentence because it exceeded the proven loss and was improperly framed.

  • Theft
  • Sentencing
  • Compensation Order
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 300
  • Suspended Sentence
  • Compensation-order
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2004] ZAFSHC 164

S v Louw

S v Louw [2004] ZAFSHC 164 (23 September 2004)

The High Court confirmed the conviction but set aside the sentence because a compensation order was imposed without the procedure required by section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

  • Sentencing
  • Compensation Order
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 300
  • Compensation-order
  • Criminal-procedure-act-section-300
  • Theft-review
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2001] ZANWHC 43

S v Setlhako and Others (101/01)

S v Setlhako and Others (101/01) [2001] ZANWHC 43 (25 October 2001)

The High Court confirmed a theft conviction but set aside a compensation-based sentence because the amount was unclear, the accused were not heard, and alternative imprisonment was improper.

  • Theft
  • Compensation Order
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 300
  • Civil Judgment Effect
  • Sentencing Review
  • Compensation-order
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.