S v Ngceni (CA&R: 176/2015) [2015] ZAECGHC 69 (7 July 2015)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
CA&R: 176/2015
Judges
P.W. Tshiki, G.H. Bloem
The High Court confirmed a fraud conviction and sentence, but set aside a section 300 compensation order because the prosecutor lacked instructions from the injured person.
S v Velaphi (2012000329) [2013] ZAECGHC 3 (1 January 2013)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
2012000329
Judges
M Makaula, D van Zyl
The magistrate erred in applying section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Act to award compensation to the buyer of the stolen cows. The section requires that the application for compensation be made by or on behalf of the person who suffered loss or damage as a result of the offence. In this case, the complainants (owners of the cows) did not suffer loss, as their property was returned. The buyer, who suffered the monetary loss, was not the complainant and there is no evidence that the prosecutor was instructed by him to apply for compensation. Furthermore, the amount awarded (R9,200) exceeded…
S v Khoza (61/0960/2009) [2010] ZAGPJHC 94; 2011 (1) SACR 482 (GSJ) (20 October 2010)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
61/0960/2009
Judges
C. J. Claassen, R. Mokgoatlheng
High Court review of a theft conviction held that the compensation order was procedurally defective, but the conviction stood and sentence was set aside.
S v Mahlangu and Another (A1228/2005) [2005] ZAGPHC 312 (22 August 2005)
Court
High Courts - Gauteng
Case number
A1228/2005
Judges
S J Mynhardt, B R du Plessis
The High Court confirmed a theft conviction but set aside a compensation condition attached to a suspended sentence because it exceeded the proven loss and was improperly framed.
The High Court confirmed the conviction but set aside the sentence because a compensation order was imposed without the procedure required by section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
S v Setlhako and Others (101/01) [2001] ZANWHC 43 (25 October 2001)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
101/01
Judges
M M Leeuw, B E Nkabinde
The High Court confirmed a theft conviction but set aside a compensation-based sentence because the amount was unclear, the accused were not heard, and alternative imprisonment was improper.