Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual Property [2024] ZACCP 1

Astellas Pharma Incorporated v Medpro Pharmaceutica (Pty) Ltd and Others (2023/021642)

Astellas Pharma Incorporated v Medpro Pharmaceutica (Pty) Ltd and Others (2023/021642) [2024] ZACCP 1 (26 June 2024)

The court allowed Astellas to amend its mirabegron patent and stayed revocation proceedings, finding Cipla had not proved invalidity, delay, or prejudice.

  • Patent Amendment
  • Revocation Proceedings
  • Culpable Delay
  • Inventive Step
  • Pharmaceutical Patents
  • Patent-amendment
Read case analysis
Intellectual Property [2014] ZASCA 201

Bayer Pharma AG v Pharma Dynamics (Pty) Ltd (1066/2013)

Bayer Pharma AG v Pharma Dynamics (Pty) Ltd (1066/2013) [2014] ZASCA 201; 2014 BIP 87 (SCA) (28 November 2014)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Bayer’s proposed patent amendment was not unclear and granted the amendment, rejecting delay and misconduct objections.

  • Patent Amendment
  • Lack Of Clarity
  • Culpable Delay
  • Reprehensible Conduct
  • Costs Award
  • Patent-amendment
Read case analysis
Intellectual Property [2008] ZACCP 3

H Lundbeck A/S and Another v Cipla Medpro (Pty) Ltd (89/4476)

H Lundbeck A/S and Another v Cipla Medpro (Pty) Ltd (89/4476) [2008] ZACCP 3; 2008 BIP 79 (CP) (20 June 2008)

The court found that the applicants failed to establish that the errors in claims 6 and 7 of the patent were clerical in nature. The evidence provided was vague, lacked factual support, and did not explain how the errors occurred. The applicants' delay in seeking correction or amendment was found to be culpable, as they were aware of the errors for years but only acted when their patent was challenged by the respondent. The proposed amendments to claims 6 and 7 would impermissibly broaden the scope of the patent, offending section 51(7) of the Patents Act. As a result, the patent was not whol…

  • Patent Amendment
  • Clerical Error
  • Interim Interdict
  • Scope Of Claims
  • Culpable Delay
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.