Gerber v PSG Wealth Financial Planning (Pty) Ltd (36447/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 270 (23 March 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
36447/2021
Judge
Fisher
The court found that the defendant was contractually obliged to protect the plaintiff against fraud, including cybercrime, by employing effective procedures and technological systems. The defendant failed to establish a tacit term excluding liability where the plaintiff's system was hacked, as such a term would undermine the express contractual protections. The defendant ignored its own verification protocols and proceeded with payments despite clear indications of risk and anomalies in the account verification process. The plaintiff had no duty to prevent hacking, and there was no evidence o…
Safi v Gascoigne Randon and Associates (23052/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 259 (6 March 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
23052/2022
Judge
MIA
The High Court dismissed an exception to particulars of claim in a cyber-fraud conveyancing dispute, holding the pleaded case was not vague or lacking material facts.
Osagiede and Others v S (A95/22) [2022] ZAWCHC 166; [2022] 4 All SA 845 (WCC) (1 September 2022)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A95/22
Judge
Thulare
The High Court dismissed an extradition-related bail appeal by eight appellants, finding the State had shown risks of flight, interference, and undermining justice.
Otubu v Director of Public Prosecutions, Western Cape (A54/2022; 16/750/2021) [2022] ZAWCHC 79; 2022 (2) SACR 311 (WCC) (16 May 2022)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A54/2022; 16/750/2021
Judge
G L Carter
High Court appeal against refusal of bail pending extradition was upheld. The court found the magistrate had treated the accused collectively rather than individually.
Msomi v S (39/2018) [2019] ZAECGHC 80; 2020 (1) SACR 197 (ECG) (3 September 2019)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
39/2018
Judges
J.E. Smith, S. Rugunanan
The High Court set aside irregular sentences and reduced the appellant’s sentences after finding substantial and compelling circumstances, despite his central role in cyber-enabled fraud.