Direro v Van Bruggen and Another (18882/2022)
Direro v Van Bruggen and Another (18882/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1935 (10 November 2023)
Provisional sequestration was refused because the applicant failed to prove a subsisting debt, factual insolvency, or advantage to creditors.
- Provisional Sequestration
- Act Of Insolvency
- Trust Account Liability
- Cybercrime Loss
- Onus Of Proof
- Advantage Of Creditors