Raqa v Hofman (A38/2009) [2009] ZAWCHC 90; 2010 (1) SA 302 (WCC) (29 May 2009)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A38/2009
Judges
Saldanha, Binns-Ward
The court held that the respondent did not have locus standi to claim damages under the Aquilian action because he was neither the owner nor the possessor of the vehicle at the time of the damage, nor did he bear the risk of damage. The respondent's interest was contingent and purely financial, arising from his role as guarantor for the payment under the instalment sale agreement, but not as a risk-bearing possessor. The evidence showed that Mr Ngceza, who had possession and bore the risk, was the proper party to claim for the damage. The magistrate erred in treating the respondent as a hire-…
Artone Press (Pty) Ltd v Haddons Trading (Pty) Ltd (537/92) [1994] ZASCA 44 (29 March 1994)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
537/92
Judges
Botha, Smalberger, Mahomed
The court held that the appellant proved on a balance of probabilities that the respondent’s repair staff negligently caused damage to a printing machine.