Dewlal v Cebra Lancet RSA (Pty) Ltd (JS685/24)
Dewlal v Cebra Lancet RSA (Pty) Ltd (JS685/24) [2025] ZALCJHB 236 (18 June 2025)
The court found that the Respondent's exception was not an irregular step under Rule 57, as the procedural requirements for notice only apply to exceptions based on vagueness and embarrassment, which was not the case here. The Applicant failed to demonstrate any procedural irregularity by the Respondent. On the merits, the Applicant's statement of case did not disclose a cause of action, as it relied solely on a confidentiality clause without specifying the breached terms. The Applicant did not plead the requirements for interdictory relief and sought damages not recognised in South African l…
Source excerpt
- Mutual Separation Agreement
- Confidentiality Clause
- Exception Procedure
- Interdictory Relief
- Damages In Lieu Of Specific Performance