Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2021] ZASCA 71

Mananga and Others v Minister of Police (342/2020)

Mananga and Others v Minister of Police (342/2020) [2021] ZASCA 71; 2021 (2) SACR 225 (SCA) (4 June 2021)

The SCA held that police had reasonable grounds to suspect a Schedule 1 assault with dangerous wounds, making the warrantless arrest and detention lawful.

  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Reasonable Suspicion
  • Dangerous Wound
  • Section 40 1 B Criminal Procedure Act
  • Damages For Wrongful Arrest
  • Unlawful-arrest
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2018] ZAECMHC 32

Qwaba v Minister of Safety and Security (CA&R58/2017)

Qwaba v Minister of Safety and Security (CA&R58/2017) [2018] ZAECMHC 32 (12 June 2018)

The arresting officer did not establish or hold a suspicion that the appellant inflicted a dangerous wound as required by Schedule 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act. The officer relied on general allegations and failed to investigate the nature and seriousness of the wound prior to arrest. The jurisdictional facts for a lawful warrantless arrest were not present. The court a quo erred in finding the arrest and detention lawful. Furthermore, the malicious prosecution claim was properly consolidated and included in the pre-trial orders, and the court a quo erred in failing to determine it on the…

  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Unlawful Detention
  • Malicious Prosecution
  • Section 40 Criminal Procedure Act
  • Dangerous Wound
  • Jurisdictional Factors
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2014] ZAECGHC 57

Grahamstown Eastern Cape High Court (CA13/2014)

Grahamstown Eastern Cape High Court (CA13/2014) [2014] ZAECGHC 57 (20 June 2014)

The court held that the arresting officer, Matondolo, did not have solid grounds to suspect that the complainant had suffered a dangerous wound as required by s 40(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The available information, including the complainant's affidavit, the J88 medical report, and the officer's own observations, indicated that the injuries were superficial and not life-threatening. The officer's speculation that the injuries could become serious was not supported by the medical evidence, which concluded the wounds were superficial and the complainant was discharged from hospital…

  • Wrongful Arrest
  • Reasonable Suspicion
  • Dangerous Wound
  • Damages
  • Criminal Procedure Act
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.