Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2022] ZAWCHC 66

Audacia Stellenbosch Market (Pty) Ltd v Downing Investments CC and Another (8552/21)

Audacia Stellenbosch Market (Pty) Ltd v Downing Investments CC and Another (8552/21) [2022] ZAWCHC 66 (3 May 2022)

The High Court refused leave to appeal in a winding-up dispute, holding that authority and standing were not established and no reasonable prospects existed.

  • Locus Standi
  • Winding Up Of Solvent Company
  • Deadlock In Management
  • Extended Standing
  • Costs Award
  • Locus-standi
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2022] ZANWHC 15

Seete v Tshiamo Resources (PTY) Ltd and Another (M121/2018)

Seete v Tshiamo Resources (PTY) Ltd and Another (M121/2018) [2022] ZANWHC 15 (16 March 2022)

The court dismissed a winding-up application based on alleged deadlock and oppression, and granted a counter-application ordering repayment of R84,500 and cancellation of the applicant’s shares.

  • Winding Up Of Company
  • Minority Shareholder Oppression
  • Deadlock In Management
  • Director Removal
  • Share Certificate Cancellation
  • Winding-up-of-company
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2021] ZAGPJHC 85

Barbaglia N.O and Others v Noble Land (Pty) Ltd and Others (A5041/2020)

Barbaglia N.O and Others v Noble Land (Pty) Ltd and Others (A5041/2020) [2021] ZAGPJHC 85 (24 June 2021)

The court found that Noble Land is solvent, with assets far exceeding liabilities, and that its monthly expenses are met. However, the relationship between the two main shareholders/directors, Michael and Gregory Barbaglia, has irretrievably broken down, resulting in a deadlock that prevents the company from functioning as intended. The court held that the failure to plead under the correct Companies Act was not fatal, as the just and equitable ground for winding-up is available under both the 1973 and 2008 Acts, and the facts and contentions were sufficiently established. The court exercised…

  • Just And Equitable Winding Up
  • Deadlock In Management
  • Company Solvent
  • Family Business Dispute
  • Oppressive Conduct
  • Universal Partnership
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2014] ZAGPPHC 385

Botha and Another v Adroit Communications (Pty) Ltd (21203/2014)

Botha and Another v Adroit Communications (Pty) Ltd (21203/2014) [2014] ZAGPPHC 385 (17 June 2014)

The High Court ordered Adroit Communications wound up on a just and equitable basis because of complete deadlock between directors and shareholders.

  • Just And Equitable Winding Up
  • Deadlock In Management
  • Board Governance
  • Shareholder Disputes
  • Just-and-equitable-winding-up
  • Board-deadlock
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2009] ZAKZDHC 70

Molokoane v Diversified Power & Systems Integration (Pty) Ltd (3235/09)

Molokoane v Diversified Power & Systems Integration (Pty) Ltd (3235/09) [2009] ZAKZDHC 70 (18 November 2009)

The court dismissed an opposed just-and-equitable winding-up application, finding no prima facie case and no basis to refer factual disputes to oral evidence.

  • Just And Equitable Winding Up
  • Shareholder Disputes
  • Deadlock In Management
  • Section 344 Companies Act
  • Arbitration Clauses
  • Section 252 Companies Act
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.