Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPJHC 679

Mbonambi and Another v eJobourg Retirement Fund and Others (20601/2022)

Mbonambi and Another v eJobourg Retirement Fund and Others (20601/2022) [2025] ZAGPJHC 679 (14 July 2025)

The court found that the Fund had complied with its statutory duty under section 37C of the Pension Funds Act by tracing and considering all potential dependants and nominees. The Fund exercised its discretion lawfully and rationally, taking into account the affidavits and evidence presented. The applicants failed to provide sufficient proof of dependency, and the Fund’s decision to allocate the death benefit solely to Mrs Mbonambi Senior was supported by rational reasons and the deceased’s nomination. The non-joinder of Mrs Mbonambi Senior did not preclude determination of the matter, as her…

  • Pension Funds Act
  • Death Benefit Distribution
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Review Of Administrative Decision
Read case analysis
Banking And Finance [2024] ZAMPMBHC 52

South African Retirement Annuity Fund v Pension Funds Adjudicator and Another (4544 / 2023)

South African Retirement Annuity Fund v Pension Funds Adjudicator and Another (4544 / 2023) [2024] ZAMPMBHC 52 (7 August 2024)

The court held that the twelve-month period for tracing dependants under section 37C(1)(c) of the Pension Funds Act commences when the Fund becomes aware of the member's death, not from the actual date of death. This interpretation aligns with the purpose of the Act, which is to protect dependants and ensure they receive benefits without competing with creditors of the estate. The Applicant's literal interpretation was rejected as illogical and contrary to the spirit of the legislation. The court found that condonation for the late filing of the review application should be granted, as no sub…

  • Pension Fund Benefits
  • Statutory Interpretation
  • Condonation Of Late Filing
  • Dependant Tracing
  • Death Benefit Distribution
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2023] ZAKZDHC 8

Ndwandwe v Trustees of Transnet Retirement Fund and Others (D7381/2020; D3438/2020)

Ndwandwe v Trustees of Transnet Retirement Fund and Others (D7381/2020; D3438/2020) [2023] ZAKZDHC 8; 2025 (2) SA 211 (KZD) (22 February 2023)

The court upheld a pension fund’s equitable distribution of a death benefit, finding the nomination form was not binding and the trustees acted rationally.

  • Pension Fund Discretion
  • Death Benefit Distribution
  • Nomination Form Weight
  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Equitable Apportionment
  • Pension-fund-discretion
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2019] ZAGPJHC 156

Kim v Agri Staff Pension Fund and Others (2017/47543)

Kim v Agri Staff Pension Fund and Others (2017/47543) [2019] ZAGPJHC 156 (6 February 2019)

The High Court dismissed condonation for a late PAJA review of a pension fund death-benefit decision, finding the applicants delayed too long after internal remedies ended.

  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Pension Funds Act
  • Condonation For Late Filing
  • Death Benefit Distribution
  • Dependency In Pension Law
  • Pension-funds-act
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2006] ZAGPHC 241

Berge v Alexander Forbes Retirement Fund (Pension Section) and Another (04/31647)

Berge v Alexander Forbes Retirement Fund (Pension Section) and Another (04/31647) [2006] ZAGPHC 241 (18 April 2006)

High Court review of a pension fund death-benefit distribution and Adjudicator ruling; application dismissed because the trustees acted fairly and lawfully.

  • Pension Funds Act Section 30p
  • Death Benefit Distribution
  • Trustee Discretion
  • Dependant Definition
  • Judicial Review
  • Onus Of Proof
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.