Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual Property [2013] ZASCA 112

Camworth Techologies Ltd v Videx Wire Products (Pty) Ltd t/a Videx Mining Products (702/2012)

Camworth Techologies Ltd v Videx Wire Products (Pty) Ltd t/a Videx Mining Products (702/2012) [2013] ZASCA 112; 2013 BIP 57 (SCA) (17 September 2013)

Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
702/2012
Judges
Nugent, Ponnan, Bosielo, Wallis, Swain

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Videx’s pot did not infringe Camworth’s patent because it lacked essential claim integers and operated differently.

  • Patent Infringement
  • Claim Construction
  • Essential Integers
  • Declaration Of Non Infringement
  • Patent-infringement
  • Claim-construction
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.