Mkhonza and Others v City of Johannesburg and Others (10190/2020)
Mkhonza and Others v City of Johannesburg and Others (10190/2020) [2020] ZAGPJHC 117 (21 April 2020)
The court found that the applicants failed to rebut the respondents' version that only incomplete, unoccupied structures were demolished and that no lawful occupiers were evicted. The applicants' affidavits contained internal inconsistencies, and some individuals cited as suffering hardship were not proven to be lawful occupiers. The applicants did not file a replying affidavit to address the respondents' denial of unlawful eviction or demolition. Applying the Plascon-Evans rule, the facts as presented by the respondents, together with the admitted facts, did not justify the final relief soug…
Source excerpt
- Eviction
- Demolition Of Structures
- Urgent Interdict
- Right To Housing
- Covid19 Lockdown Regulations