Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual Property [2014] ZAGPPHC 1031

Fuchs Petrolub AG v Castrol Limited and Another (35631/14)

Fuchs Petrolub AG v Castrol Limited and Another (35631/14) [2014] ZAGPPHC 1031; 2014 BIP 302 (GP) (4 December 2014)

The court found that Castrol's mark 'TITANIUM FLUID STRENGTH TECHNOLOGY' is a composite mark and must be considered in its entirety when compared to Fuchs's 'TITAN' mark. The comparison should not be limited to the dominant element 'TITANIUM'. On a global appreciation of the marks, there is no reasonable likelihood of confusion or deception between 'TITAN' and 'TITANIUM FLUID STRENGTH TECHNOLOGY', either visually, phonetically, or conceptually. The court also found that even if the comparison were limited to 'TITAN' and 'TITANIUM', the words are sufficiently distinct in meaning, appearance, a…

  • Trade Mark Opposition
  • Likelihood Of Confusion
  • Composite Marks
  • Dominant Feature Analysis
  • Section 10 Trade Marks Act
  • Descriptive Elements
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.