Troskie v S (CA&R73/2016) [2016] ZAECGHC 53 (27 July 2016)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
CA&R73/2016
Judges
S Rugunanan, M J Lowe
The High Court upheld the conviction but reduced a fraud sentence from 3 years to 2 years, finding the magistrate overemphasised deterrence and underweighted rehabilitation.
Motseki v S (A342/2014) [2015] ZAGPPHC 107 (27 February 2015)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A342/2014
Judges
N Janse van Nieuwenhuizen, M G Phatudi
The court found that the evidence, particularly the identification by Mr Palatsi and the appellant's possession of the bakkie, proved the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal against conviction was dismissed. However, the court held that the sentence of three years direct imprisonment was disproportionate to the seriousness of the offence, especially considering the appellant's personal circumstances, the relatively small value of the stolen goods, and the fact that deterrence was overemphasized by the court a quo. The sentence was set aside and replaced with a sentence of th…
Gordon v S (A769/2012) [2014] ZAGPPHC 913 (14 November 2014)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A769/2012
Judges
M Beatson, D S Fourie
The High Court reduced a seven-year sentence for motor vehicle theft to five years, finding the trial court had over-emphasised the offence and ignored mitigating factors.
Linus v S (A107/2014) [2014] ZAGPPHC 661; 2015 (1) SACR 381 (GP) (28 August 2014)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A107/2014
Judges
M V Semenya, L M Molopa-Sethosa
The High Court dismissed an appeal against a 10-year sentence for dealing in drugs, holding the magistrate properly weighed the seriousness of the offence and the need for deterrence.
White v S (A441 /2009) [2010] ZAWCHC 361 (12 February 2010)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A441 /2009
Judges
Saldanha, Van Niekerk
The court found that the magistrate had properly considered both the appellant's personal circumstances and the seriousness of the offence. The appellant was found in possession of a large quantity of crayfish tails with significant economic value, and played a key role in the distribution network. The magistrate's reasoning was supported by relevant case law, and no irregularity or misdirection was identified. The interests of the community and the need to protect marine resources justified the imposition of the maximum sentence. The appeal against sentence was therefore dismissed and the se…
White v S (A441/2009) [2010] ZAWCHC 504 (12 February 2010)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A441/2009
Judges
Saldanha, Van Niekerk
The High Court dismissed an appeal against a two-year sentence for possessing 16 290 crayfish tails, finding no misdirection or irregularity in sentencing.
S v Mnisi [2009] ZASCA 17; 2009 (2) SACR 227 (SCA) ; [2009] 3 All SA 159 (SCA) (19 March 2009)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
391/08
Judges
Cloete JA, Maya JA, Boruchowitz AJA
The Supreme Court of Appeal reduced a murder sentence to five years, holding that the trial court undervalued diminished responsibility and overemphasized deterrence.