Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2017] ZAGPJHC 256

New Heights Developers (Pty) Ltd v Bogatsu (2013/24397)

New Heights Developers (Pty) Ltd v Bogatsu (2013/24397) [2017] ZAGPJHC 256 (15 September 2017)

Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2013/24397
Judge
Spilg

The High Court held that a section 165 demand was valid, finding the respondent had standing and that the demand related to protecting New Heights’ legal interests.

  • Derivative Actions
  • Companies Act 71 Of 2008
  • Shareholder Disputes
  • Director Status
  • Vexatious Litigation
  • Derivative-actions
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.