Du Plessis v Legal Practice Council (EL967/2023)
Du Plessis v Legal Practice Council (EL967/2023) [2024] ZAECELLC 38 (20 August 2024)
The court found that although there was an undue delay of almost four years in finalising the disciplinary proceedings, the delay did not materially prejudice the applicant's ability to defend himself. The applicant had full access to the record and was able to cross-examine witnesses and present his case. The seriousness of the allegations warranted thorough investigation, and some delay was tolerable. The applicant's challenge was based on the merits of the Disciplinary Committee's ruling rather than its legality or procedural fairness, amounting to an appeal rather than a review. The appli…
Source excerpt
- Legal Practice Act
- Disciplinary Proceedings Delay
- Review Of Administrative Action
- Procedural Fairness
- Internal Remedies Exhaustion