H.J v P.J (285/2023)
H.J v P.J (285/2023) [2024] ZASCA 55 (19 April 2024)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the regional court's order compelling the respondent to furnish further particulars was purely interlocutory, lacking final effect and not disposing of any substantial portion of the relief claimed in the divorce action. The doctrine of finality, as articulated in Zweni and reaffirmed in TWK, governs appealability for courts other than the Constitutional Court. The interests of justice standard does not apply to the Supreme Court of Appeal in determining appealability. The high court erred by entertaining the merits of the appeal without first considering…
Source excerpt
- Spousal Maintenance
- Interlocutory Orders
- Appealability
- Matrimonial Property Act
- Discovery And Further Particulars