Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 530

Du Toit v Minister of Police and Another (23923/2015)

Du Toit v Minister of Police and Another (23923/2015) [2024] ZAGPPHC 530 (7 June 2024)

Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
23923/2015
Judge
Neukircher

The court found that the traffic officer was not empowered under Government Gazette R209 to effect an arrest, as his powers were limited to issuing written notices and executing warrants. Even if the officer could invoke s40(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act, he was required to exercise discretion, which he failed to do, as he was unaware of such discretion and arrested the plaintiff as a matter of routine. The plaintiff had provided verifiable identification, cooperated fully, and posed no flight risk, making arrest unnecessary. The SAPS, upon receiving the plaintiff, were required to exer…

Source excerpt

  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Unlawful Detention
  • Peace Officer Powers
  • Constitutional Rights
  • Discretion In Arrest
  • Damages Liability
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZANCHC 87

Dikwidi v Minister of Police and Another (292/2021)

Dikwidi v Minister of Police and Another (292/2021) [2023] ZANCHC 87 (30 November 2023)

Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
292/2021
Judge
Phatshoane

The court found that the plaintiff presented documents with material discrepancies and misrepresentations regarding the operating licence and permit, which amounted to fraud. The arresting officer, a peace officer, observed these discrepancies directly and was entitled to arrest without a warrant under section 40(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The officer exercised discretion rationally, as evidenced by his testimony and the prevalence of fraudulent activities in the taxi industry. The plaintiff failed to testify or rebut the prima facie case of fraud. The State suffered prejudice due t…

Source excerpt

  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Wrongful Detention
  • Fraud
  • Operating Licence Requirements
  • Discretion In Arrest
  • Public Transport Regulation
Read case analysis
Delict [2013] ZAWCHC 86

Danti v Minister of Safety and Security and Another (14903/2012)

Danti v Minister of Safety and Security and Another (14903/2012) [2013] ZAWCHC 86 (7 June 2013)

Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
14903/2012
Judge
J I Cloete

The court found the plaintiff's version of events to be consistent and credible, while the defendants' evidence was contradictory and tailored. The police officers failed to exercise the discretion required by section 40(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act, acting under a mistaken belief that arrest was mandatory. The plaintiff's arrest and subsequent detention were unlawful, as the investigating officer had concluded she could be released on bail, yet she remained incarcerated. The court held that the plaintiff was assaulted twice by Officer Ndala without justification, and the defendants fa…

Source excerpt

  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Unlawful Detention
  • Assault By Police
  • Discretion In Arrest
  • Damages For Personal Injury
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2012] ZAGPJHC 202

Khambule v Minister of Police (11/05013)

Khambule v Minister of Police (11/05013) [2012] ZAGPJHC 202 (12 October 2012)

Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
11/05013
Judge
A J Bester

The court found that the arresting officers did not properly exercise their discretion under section 40(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The arrest was effected mechanically, without consideration of alternative methods such as written notice or police bail, and the discretion was wrongly abdicated to another official. The offence for which the plaintiff was arrested—a minor slap and verbal abuse—was trivial and did not justify arrest or continued detention. The plaintiff's continued incarceration in sub-human conditions beyond the evening of his arrest was unjustified and unlawful. The c…

Source excerpt

  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Unlawful Detention
  • Damages Assessment
  • Police Misconduct
  • Discretion In Arrest
  • Party And Party Costs
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.