Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2019] ZALCCT 22

National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa and Others v South African Road Passenger Bargaining Council and Others; Mbusi v South African Road Passenger Bargaining Council and Others (C352; C329)

National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa and Others v South African Road Passenger Bargaining Council and Others; Mbusi v South African Road Passenger Bargaining Council and Others (C352; C329) [2019] ZALCCT 22 (14 August 2019)

Court
Labour Court Cape Town
Case number
C352; C329
Judge
Rabkin-Naicker

The Labour Court reviewed and set aside an arbitration award after finding the record inadequate, and remitted the dismissal dispute for rehearing before a different arbitrator.

  • Review Of Arbitration Award
  • Condonation Application
  • Dismissal For Refusal To Work
  • Adequacy Of Record
  • Remittal For Rehearing
  • Labour-law
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2016] ZALAC 50

TFD Network Africa (Pty) Ltd v Singh N.O. and Others (CA16/15)

TFD Network Africa (Pty) Ltd v Singh N.O. and Others (CA16/15) [2016] ZALAC 50; [2017] 4 BLLR 377 (LAC); (2017) 38 ILJ 1119 (LAC) (8 November 2016)

Court
Labour Appeal Court
Case number
CA 16/15
Judges
A A Landman, B Waglay, K M Savage

The Labour Appeal Court held that night work includes any work after 18:00 and before 06:00, and transport must be available at the end of overtime.

  • Night Work
  • Collective Agreement Interpretation
  • Dismissal For Refusal To Work
  • Transport Obligations
  • Basic Conditions Of Employment Act
  • Arbitration Review
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2002] ZALAC 9

NUMSA v Lumex Clipsal (Pty) Ltd (JA51/2000)

NUMSA v Lumex Clipsal (Pty) Ltd (JA51/2000) [2002] ZALAC 9; [2002] 6 BLLR 511 (LAC) (19 April 2002)

Court
Labour Appeal Court
Case number
JA51/2000
Judges
M.T.R. Mogoeng, R.M.M. Zondo, D. van Reenen

The Labour Appeal Court held that employees who undertook to work a six-day/three-shift system were bound by the integrated two-machines-per-operator requirement.

  • Dismissal For Refusal To Work
  • Job Description Dispute
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Retrenchment
  • Unprotected Strike Action
  • Labour-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.