Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2024] ZANCT 66

National Consumer Commission v Braai Block (Pty) Ltd (NCT/341406/2024/73(2)(b))

National Consumer Commission v Braai Block (Pty) Ltd (NCT/341406/2024/73(2)(b)) [2024] ZANCT 66 (10 December 2024)

Court
National Consumer Tribunal
Case number
NCT/341406/2024/73(2)(b)
Judges
A Potwana, Z Ntuli, S Hockey

The Tribunal found the supplier charged undisclosed service fees and failed to include trading addresses on transaction records, declaring the conduct prohibited and imposing a R1 million fine.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Prohibited Conduct
  • Displayed Price
  • Transaction Record Requirements
  • Consumer-protection
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2015] ZACGSO 6

Dispute Identification (201504-0174)

Dispute Identification (201504-0174) [2015] ZACGSO 6 (5 May 2015)

Court
Consumer Goods and Services Ombud
Case number
201504-0174
Judge
B Hughes

The Ombud held that the supplier had to honour the displayed couch price because the sale was already concluded before the pricing error was corrected.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Displayed Price
  • Contract Perfecta
  • Unilateral Mistake
  • Binding Offer
  • Displayed-price
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2003] ZACGSO 1

Incorrect price advertised: price not binding (Case 2) (20121024315)

Incorrect price advertised: price not binding (Case 2) (20121024315) [2003] ZACGSO 1 (24 June 2003)

Court
Consumer Goods and Services Ombud
Case number
20121024315
Judge
N Melville

An ombud found an advertised drawer-unit price error was not clearly proven, and suggested a बिना prejudice R100 voucher for inconvenience and travel costs.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Advertised Price Error
  • Displayed Price
  • Misleading Advertising
  • Consumer-protection
  • Misleading-advertising
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.