Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2004] ZAGPHC 38

B P Southern Africa (Pty) Limited v MEC for Agriculture, Conservation Environment & Land Affairs (03/16337)

B P Southern Africa (Pty) Limited v MEC for Agriculture, Conservation Environment & Land Affairs (03/16337) [2004] ZAGPHC 38; [2004] 3 All SA 201 (W); 2004 (5) SA 124 (W) (1 May 2004)

The court held that the Department's mandate in considering applications for environmental authorisation is broad, encompassing not only environmental but also social and economic factors, as required by the Constitution, ECA, NEMA, and DFA. The Department was entitled to adopt and apply guidelines, including the distance stipulation, provided it did not do so rigidly or to the exclusion of other relevant considerations. The evidence showed that the Department considered multiple factors and did not apply the distance stipulation as an absolute rule. The Department's decision was reasonable,…

  • Environmental Authorisation
  • Guidelines In Administrative Decision
  • Distance Stipulation
  • Sustainable Development
  • Judicial Review
  • Constitutional Right To Environment
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2004] ZAGPHC 18

BP Southern Africa (Pty) Limited v Mec for Agriculture, Conservation, Environment & Land Affair (03/16337)

BP Southern Africa (Pty) Limited v Mec for Agriculture, Conservation, Environment & Land Affair (03/16337) [2004] ZAGPHC 18 (31 March 2004)

The court held that the Department's mandate, as derived from the Constitution, ECA, NEMA, and DFA, requires consideration of environmental, social, and economic factors in authorising activities that may impact the environment. The Department was entitled to adopt and apply guidelines, including the distance stipulation, provided it did not fetter its discretion. The evidence showed the Department considered a range of factors and did not apply the distance rule rigidly. The Department's refusal was based on environmental concerns, including cumulative impacts, sustainability, and potential…

  • Environmental Authorisation
  • Distance Stipulation
  • Guidelines For Filling Stations
  • Sustainable Development
  • Judicial Review
  • Constitutional Right To Environment
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.