F.I v A.P (2021/13610)
F.I v A.P (2021/13610) [2021] ZAGPJHC 119 (5 August 2021)
The court condoned the short notice given to the respondent as there was no prejudice. The application to introduce a supplementary affidavit was refused, as the circumstances did not justify its admission at this stage, but the applicant may seek leave to file such an affidavit after financial disclosure is made. The court held that Rule 43 applies because the applicant has instituted an action under the Divorce Act, and the SCA's decision in Women's Legal Centre Trust does not preclude the application, as its order of invalidity is not yet in force pending confirmation by the Constitutional…
Source excerpt
- Rule 43 Applications
- Islamic Marriage Recognition
- Financial Disclosure
- Interim Relief
- Divorce Act Applicability