S.A.T v G.J.T (2019/22224)
S.A.T v G.J.T (2019/22224) [2025] ZAGPJHC 44 (24 January 2025)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a material change in circumstances since the previous order, as several new interlocutory applications had arisen and the respondent had failed to comply with the prior order for contribution. The applicant remains unemployed and does not have guaranteed access to trust funds, as payment depends on trustee discretion. The respondent is of substantial means and has not shown any deterioration in his financial position. The court accepted that costs for interlocutory applications, except those already covered by the previous order (such as the…
Source excerpt
- Rule 43 Contribution
- Divorce Litigation
- Discretionary Trusts
- Material Change In Circumstances
- Equality Of Arms