Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Banking And Finance [2025] ZANCT 21

Bezuidenhout v Absa Bank Limited (NCT/292129/2023/141(1)(b))

Bezuidenhout v Absa Bank Limited (NCT/292129/2023/141(1)(b)) [2025] ZANCT 21 (8 April 2025)

The National Consumer Tribunal dismissed a consumer’s section 141(1)(b) NCA application against ABSA, finding no NCA duty to supply the requested documents.

  • National Credit Act
  • Consumer Rights
  • Document Disclosure
  • Cost Orders
  • Affordability Assessment
  • National-credit-act
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPPHC 614

Eldo Village Home Owners Association (NPC) v Pfananani Phanuel Makuya (86467/2017)

Eldo Village Home Owners Association (NPC) v Pfananani Phanuel Makuya (86467/2017) [2022] ZAGPPHC 614 (24 August 2022)

Interlocutory application postponed sine die pending disclosure of specified documents, with a reciprocal obligation to provide an occupation certificate and no costs order.

  • Postponement
  • Document Disclosure
  • Occupation Certificate
  • Costs Order
  • Interlocutory-application
  • Document-disclosure
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2017] ZACAC 2

S.O.S Support Public Broadcasting Coalition and Others v South African Broadcasting Corporation (Soc) Limited and Others (140/CAC/Mar16)

S.O.S Support Public Broadcasting Coalition and Others v South African Broadcasting Corporation (Soc) Limited and Others (140/CAC/Mar16) [2017] ZACAC 2; [2017] 1 CPLR 65 (CAC) (28 April 2017)

The court dismissed an application to expand a prior order. It held the Competition Commission’s remit was limited to documents and did not include s 49A investigative powers.

  • Merger Notification
  • Change Of Control
  • Powers Of Competition Commission
  • Court Order Interpretation
  • Document Disclosure
  • Court-order-interpretation
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2014] ZAGPPHC 696

Proconse Consulting Engineers (Pty) Limited v Intersite Property Management Services (Pty) Limited (22767/2011)

Proconse Consulting Engineers (Pty) Limited v Intersite Property Management Services (Pty) Limited (22767/2011) [2014] ZAGPPHC 696 (26 August 2014)

The court found that the plaintiff had established good and strong reasons for postponement, particularly the need to obtain relevant documentation from third parties and the recent revelation regarding the cancellation of its contract due to lack of funding. Although the application was not made timeously, the interests of justice and fairness justified granting the postponement. The court also found that the plaintiff's conduct in delaying the application warranted an adverse costs order. The application for postponement was granted, with directions for the plaintiff to secure the necessary…

  • Postponement Of Trial
  • Wasted Costs
  • Oral Agreement
  • Document Disclosure
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2013] ZALCJHB 63

Mahoko v Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality and Others (J878/13)

Mahoko v Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality and Others (J878/13) [2013] ZALCJHB 63 (8 May 2013)

The applicant failed to establish a prima facie right to the relief sought, as the urgency was self-created and the delay in the disciplinary process did not constitute exceptional circumstances warranting intervention. The Municipality had applied for condonation as required, and the applicant did not object until much later. Legal representation was granted at the applicant's request, and reciprocal appointments by the Municipality were not exceptional. The requirement for a written complaint was not clearly breached, and any procedural fairness concerns could be addressed through alternati…

  • Disciplinary Hearing
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Document Disclosure
  • Legal Representation
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2008] ZAFSHC 56

Van Heerden and Others v Suidwes Landbou (Edms) Beperk and Another (370/2008)

Van Heerden and Others v Suidwes Landbou (Edms) Beperk and Another (370/2008) [2008] ZAFSHC 56 (26 June 2008)

The court found that the settlement agreement and cession established an agency relationship between the first applicant and the first respondent. As agent, the first respondent was obliged to account fully for its dealings with the maize, including providing all supporting documents and allowing inspection of its books. The applicants had established a sufficient basis for requiring access to the documents and information to protect their rights, both under the law of agency and the Constitution. The respondents' refusal to disclose the details and supporting documentation was unjustified. T…

  • Agency Relationship
  • Mandate Contract
  • Right To Accounting
  • Document Disclosure
  • Constitutional Right Of Access
  • Stay Of Execution
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.