Dayani v Talium Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (9148/2012)
Dayani v Talium Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (9148/2012) [2013] ZAGPPHC 558 (26 February 2013)
The court found that the adjudicators complied with all material procedures prescribed by the regulations and acted fairly in the domain name dispute process. The applicant was legally represented and had the opportunity to object or request to respond to new facts but failed to do so. The grounds for review were vague and unsupported by evidence. The adjudicators correctly applied the law regarding trade mark proprietorship and the principle of priority in time. There was no procedural unfairness, error of law, or improper exercise of discretion. The application for review was dismissed as n…
Source excerpt
- Domain Name Dispute
- Trade Mark Proprietorship
- Administrative Review
- Electronic Communications And Transactions Act