Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2024] ZANCHC 55

Majosi v S (K/S 16/17)

Majosi v S (K/S 16/17) [2024] ZANCHC 55 (7 June 2024)

The High Court refused leave to appeal against convictions for robbery with aggravating circumstances and murder, and against the sentences imposed.

  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
  • Murder
  • Dna Evidence
  • Appeal Leave
  • Drugs And Drug Trafficking
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] ZAFSHC 407

S v Nwodo (R41/2023)

S v Nwodo (R41/2023) [2023] ZAFSHC 407 (20 October 2023)

The High Court confirmed the conviction of Kenneth Chukwuebuka Nwodo but corrected a sentencing error caused by a mistaken reference to a repealed provision.

  • Drugs And Drug Trafficking
  • Plea And Sentence Agreement
  • Suspended Sentence
  • Correction Of Sentence
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2016] ZAECGHC 123

Breakfast v S (CA&R182/2016)

Breakfast v S (CA&R182/2016) [2016] ZAECGHC 123 (8 November 2016)

The appeal court set aside a drugs sentence because the magistrate failed to wait for a social worker’s report about the appellant’s minor children.

  • Sentencing Guidelines
  • Primary Caregiver
  • Best Interests Of Child
  • Drugs And Drug Trafficking
  • Children's Act
  • Appeal Procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2002] ZASCA 122

S v Legoa (33/2002)

S v Legoa (33/2002) [2002] ZASCA 122; [2002] 4 All SA 373 (SCA); 2003 (1) SACR 13 (SCA) (26 September 2002)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the minimum sentencing provisions of Act 105 of 1997 require the State to prove all elements of the scheduled offence, including the value threshold, before conviction. The evidence established that the dagga seized was worth at most R20,000 in bulk, far below the R50,000 threshold required for the minimum sentence. The trial court erred in accepting the street value per gram without evidence that bulk dagga would fetch the same price. Furthermore, the appellant was not properly warned that the minimum sentencing legislation would be invoked, and the char…

  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Drugs And Drug Trafficking
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Charge Sheet Requirements
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.