South Africa Case Law

Van Tonder en Andere v Vorster (541/94)

Van Tonder en Andere v Vorster (541/94) [1996] ZASCA 32; 1996 (3) SA 383 (SCA); [1996] 2 All SA 229 (A); (27 March 1996)

Court

Supreme Court of Appeal

Case number

541/94

Judges

Botha, E M Grosskopf, Harms, Scott, Plewman

The court held that evidence was admissible to show that cheques were endorsed by an agent acting under authority, so the respondent remained entitled to judgment.

• Negotiable Instruments
• Holder In Due Course
• Parol Evidence Rule
• Agency
• Endorsement Of Cheques
• Negotiable-instruments