Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2024] ZAGPJHC 1273

Surgical Innovations (Pty) Ltd v Bouwer and Others (2024/132565)

Surgical Innovations (Pty) Ltd v Bouwer and Others (2024/132565) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1273 (6 December 2024)

The High Court enforced restraint of trade agreements against two former employees of Surgical Innovations, rejecting arguments that arbitration and mootness barred urgent relief.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Enforcement Of Contracts
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Confidential Information
  • Restraint-of-trade
  • Urgent-application
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2024] ZALCJHB 142

B Sure Insurance Advisors (Pty) Ltd v Schnepel and Another (J29/24)

B Sure Insurance Advisors (Pty) Ltd v Schnepel and Another (J29/24) [2024] ZALCJHB 142 (22 March 2024)

The Labour Court dismissed an urgent restraint-of-trade application after finding the applicant had not proved that the new employer was a competitor.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Confidential Information
  • Enforcement Of Contracts
  • Protectable Interest
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2020] ZAGPJHC 283

Kalex Flavours and Fragrances (Pty) Limited and Others v Muller (27224/2020)

Kalex Flavours and Fragrances (Pty) Limited and Others v Muller (27224/2020) [2020] ZAGPJHC 283 (9 November 2020)

The court found that the respondent had breached the restraint of trade agreement during his employment by diverting business to a competitor and exploiting confidential information and customer relationships. The respondent failed to provide a substantive version in his answering affidavit and did not rebut the applicants' case with credible evidence. The court held that the applicants were entitled to protect both categories of proprietary interests—customer relationships and trade secrets. The respondent's tender for a six-month restraint was inadequate given the depth and duration of his…

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Enforcement Of Contracts
  • Confidential Information
  • Proprietary Interests
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2019] ZAFSHC 119

S A Sight Enhancement Initiative v Benade and Others (278/2019)

S A Sight Enhancement Initiative v Benade and Others (278/2019) [2019] ZAFSHC 119; 2020 (5) SA 211 (FB) (5 July 2019)

The court enforced a restraint of trade against a former contractor of a nonprofit eye-care organisation, holding the restraint was not void merely because the applicant was an NPO.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Non Profit Organisation Contracts
  • Protectable Interest
  • Public Policy
  • Enforcement Of Contracts
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2019] ZALCJHB 10

Graffiti Design Proprietary Limited v Teffu and Another (J4376/2018)

Graffiti Design Proprietary Limited v Teffu and Another (J4376/2018) [2019] ZALCJHB 10 (22 January 2019)

The Labour Court enforced a restraint of trade and confidentiality agreement against a former employee who joined a competitor and had access to confidential business information and customer relationships.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Confidential Information
  • Enforcement Of Contracts
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Restraint-of-trade
  • Confidential-information
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2018] ZAFSHC 46

Best Advice Financial Services (Pty) Ltd v Smith and Another (1991/2018)

Best Advice Financial Services (Pty) Ltd v Smith and Another (1991/2018) [2018] ZAFSHC 46 (10 May 2018)

The court enforced a restraint of trade in part, finding the respondent had solicited former clients, but reduced the restraint period from three years to six months.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Enforcement Of Contracts
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Reasonableness Of Covenant
  • Restraint-of-trade
  • Urgent-interdict
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2017] ZASCA 113

Costa NO and Others v Arvum Exports (Pty) Limited and Others (969/2016)

Costa NO and Others v Arvum Exports (Pty) Limited and Others (969/2016) [2017] ZASCA 113 (21 September 2017)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a trustee resolution did not authorize Mr Costa to conclude fruit-supply agreements, and no plant breeders’ rights infringement was shown.

  • Trustee Authority
  • Ostensible Authority
  • Interpretation Of Resolutions
  • Plant Breeders Rights Act
  • Interdict
  • Enforcement Of Contracts
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2016] ZAECELLC 7

How Do You Want It (Pty) Ltd t/a Dreadlocks Studio One v Matyumza and Others (1147/2016)

How Do You Want It (Pty) Ltd t/a Dreadlocks Studio One v Matyumza and Others (1147/2016) [2016] ZAECELLC 7 (27 September 2016)

The High Court enforced a restraint of trade against former salon employees, but only for East London, after finding urgency, breach, and limited territorial jurisdiction.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Enforcement Of Contracts
  • Interdict
  • Jurisdiction
  • Urgency
  • Employment Contracts
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.