Uniting Presbyterian Church in SA and Another v Reformed Presbyterian Church in Southern Africa and Others (1438/2018)
Uniting Presbyterian Church in SA and Another v Reformed Presbyterian Church in Southern Africa and Others (1438/2018) [2019] ZASCA 129 (30 September 2019)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the respondent, a breakaway group from the UPCSA, misrepresented its authority to the City, causing a material error in persona. As a result, no valid contract of sale for erf 546 came into existence. Applying the abstract theory of transfer, the court found that there was no real agreement to transfer and receive ownership, so ownership of erf 546 did not pass to the respondent despite registration. The UPCSA, as the successor to the RPCSA's property interests under the Basis of Union, had standing to challenge the transaction. The appellants provided a…
Source excerpt
- Transfer Of Ownership
- Error In Persona
- Abstract Theory Of Transfer
- Standing
- Condonation