Mosselbaai Boeredienste (Pty) Ltd v OKB Motors CC (1216/21) [2023] ZASCA 91 (9 June 2023)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
1216/21
Judges
Mocumie, Schippers, Carelse, Meyer, Goosen
The SCA granted special leave, condonation, and reinstatement of an appeal after an electronic payment dispute involving alleged fraud and contested prospects of success.
Violetshelf Investments (Pty) Ltd v Chetty (24858/18) [2019] ZAGPJHC 1; [2020] 4 BLLR 401 (GJ) (28 January 2019)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
24858/18
Judge
P.A. Meyer
The court held that a lease renewal option requiring further written agreement was unenforceable without a deadlock-breaking mechanism, and granted eviction.
Varico Investments (EDMS) BPK v Standard Bank of South Africa Limited and Another (770/2013) [2014] ZAWCHC 54 (14 April 2014)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
770/2013
Judge
Bozalek
The court found that the applicant failed to prove, on the papers, that the first respondent waived its rights to recover the debt. The 17 February 2012 email was ambiguous and did not unequivocally reflect an intention to abandon rights; in banking practice, 'written off' referred to internal accounting and transfer to recoveries, not a renunciation of claims. The suretyship agreement required formal written release or cancellation, which was not provided. The applicant's alternative reliance on estoppel also failed, as the email did not constitute a clear representation of waiver, and the a…
Southern Life Association Ltd. v Beyleveld NO (266/87) [1988] ZASCA 104; [1989] 1 All SA 390 (A) (22 September 1988)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
266/87
Judges
Rabie, Joubert, Smalberger, Milne, Eksteen
The Appellate Division held that an insurance company was not liable for an employee’s misleading investment advice, because the respondent failed to prove reliance on the company’s holding out.