Cosmopolitan Projects Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd v Leoa and Others (LCC174/2016)
Cosmopolitan Projects Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd v Leoa and Others (LCC174/2016) [2019] ZALCC 1 (31 May 2019)
The applicant failed to establish that the requirements of section 8 of ESTA were met. The termination of the respondents' right of residence was not lawful, just or equitable, as the respondents were not afforded procedural fairness or an opportunity to make representations before the decision was made. The settlement agreement and consent forms could not validly waive the respondents' statutory rights under ESTA. The notice relied upon by the applicant was insufficient and impermissibly conflated procedural steps. The applicant is not entitled to an eviction order, and the application must…
Source excerpt
- Extension Of Security Of Tenure Act
- Eviction Requirements
- Termination Of Right Of Residence
- Procedural Fairness
- Settlement Agreements
- Just And Equitable Standard