Mabuza v S (A861/2013)
Mabuza v S (A861/2013) [2014] ZAGPPHC 289 (29 April 2014)
The appeal court found that there were significant internal inconsistencies and contradictions between the complainant's evidence and Mahlangu's statement, which the trial court failed to properly consider. The trial court engaged in speculation rather than basing its findings on the facts before it, constituting a material misdirection. The number and nature of the contradictions cast doubt on the reliability of the State's case and the credibility of its witnesses. Furthermore, the existence of prior conflict between the complainant and the appellant provided a motive for false implication,…
Source excerpt
- Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
- Appeal Procedure
- Evidentiary Contradictions
- Reasonable Doubt