Polokwane Local Municipality v Sand Hawks (Pty) Ltd and Others (1775/2025) [2025] ZALMPPHC 84 (25 April 2025)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
1775/2025
Judge
Mashifane AJ
The High Court dismissed a reconsideration application, holding that the affected party should have anticipated the return day under Rule 6(8), not used Rule 6(12)(c).
Unlawful Invaders of Portion 0 of the Township Fleurhof Ext 21 Erven 2887, 1946, 2948, 2953, 3004 v Fleurhof Ext 2 (Pty) Ltd and Others (2024/064315) [2024] ZAGPJHC 907 (9 September 2024)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2024/064315
Judge
Noko
High Court reconsidered and set aside an ex parte interdict against alleged occupiers, dismissed the non-joinder point, and struck off a mandamus counter-application.
National Director of Public Prosecutions v Mthombeni and Others (1188/2024) [2024] ZANWHC 209 (5 August 2024)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
1188/2024
Judge
M Z Makoti
The court found that section 26 of POCA expressly authorises the NDPP to seek ex parte restraint orders over realisable property pending criminal prosecution. The Respondents' arguments regarding section 17 of POCA were misplaced, as that section deals with the conclusion of criminal proceedings, not the requirements for restraint orders. The NDPP was not required to prove the Respondents' guilt at this stage, only that there were reasonable grounds for believing a confiscation order may be made. The court held that the NDPP did not abuse its authority, as the previous decisions not to prosec…
Rasegowa Trading and Projects CC and Another v Beyond Joint Venture (Pty) Ltd and Another (056029/2024) [2024] ZAGPPHC 681 (11 July 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
056029/2024
Judge
Mooki
The High Court confirmed an ex parte interim order after finding that a close corporation member was fraudulently removed and that reconsideration was unwarranted.
National Director of Public Prosecutions v Omar (021718/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1356 (22 November 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
021718/2022
Judge
Mokate Victor Noko
The High Court dismissed a reconsideration application against a POCA preservation order over a truck, trailer, and cash, finding the truck and trailer were instrumentalities of the offence.
L.B.N v K.N - Ex Tempore (108047/2023) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1320 (25 October 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
108047/2023
Judge
Wilson
An urgent ex parte application for guardianship and relocation of a minor child to Qatar was dismissed because the biological mother was not cited or given notice.
Mfebe v Minister Of Higher Education,Science And Technology and Others (J 1040/20) [2023] ZALCJHB 43 (6 March 2023)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Case number
J 1040/20
Judge
GN Moshoana
Labour Court costs ruling after ex parte contempt proceedings and a defective bid to file further affidavits. Each party bore its own costs on the ex parte matter.
Mhlongo v Farraque and Others (43344/21) [2022] ZAGPPHC 64 (15 February 2022)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
43344/21
Judge
Tlhapi V V
The High Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal, holding that the applicant had not shown reasonable prospects of success or another compelling reason.
National Director of Public Prosecutions (Ex Parte Application) (669/2020) [2021] ZASCA 142; 2022 (1) SACR 1 (SCA) (7 October 2021)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
669/2020
Judges
Saldulker, Plasket, Mbatha, Molefe, Unterhalter
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that applications for preservation orders under section 38 of POCA are inherently urgent and do not require the applicant to establish urgency in the founding affidavit. The statutory framework of POCA and Uniform Rule 6(4)(a) provides for ex parte applications, and the practice directive of the Mpumalanga Division cannot override these provisions. The high court erred by treating the practice directive as having statutory force and by requiring the NDPP to make out a case for urgency. The appeal was upheld, and the NDPP was permitted to re-enroll the applicat…