Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZALMPPHC 84

Polokwane Local Municipality v Sand Hawks (Pty) Ltd and Others (1775/2025)

Polokwane Local Municipality v Sand Hawks (Pty) Ltd and Others (1775/2025) [2025] ZALMPPHC 84 (25 April 2025)

The High Court dismissed a reconsideration application, holding that the affected party should have anticipated the return day under Rule 6(8), not used Rule 6(12)(c).

  • Rule Nisi
  • Ex Parte Application
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Lease Termination
  • Eviction
  • Costs Order
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2024] ZAGPJHC 907

Unlawful Invaders of Portion 0 of the Township Fleurhof Ext 21 Erven 2887, 1946, 2948, 2953, 3004 v Fleurhof Ext 2 (Pty) Ltd and Others (2024/064315)

Unlawful Invaders of Portion 0 of the Township Fleurhof Ext 21 Erven 2887, 1946, 2948, 2953, 3004 v Fleurhof Ext 2 (Pty) Ltd and Others (2024/064315) [2024] ZAGPJHC 907 (9 September 2024)

High Court reconsidered and set aside an ex parte interdict against alleged occupiers, dismissed the non-joinder point, and struck off a mandamus counter-application.

  • Interim Interdict
  • Ex Parte Application
  • Counter Spoliation
  • Prevention Of Illegal Eviction Act
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Mandamus
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] ZANWHC 209

National Director of Public Prosecutions v Mthombeni and Others (1188/2024)

National Director of Public Prosecutions v Mthombeni and Others (1188/2024) [2024] ZANWHC 209 (5 August 2024)

The court found that section 26 of POCA expressly authorises the NDPP to seek ex parte restraint orders over realisable property pending criminal prosecution. The Respondents' arguments regarding section 17 of POCA were misplaced, as that section deals with the conclusion of criminal proceedings, not the requirements for restraint orders. The NDPP was not required to prove the Respondents' guilt at this stage, only that there were reasonable grounds for believing a confiscation order may be made. The court held that the NDPP did not abuse its authority, as the previous decisions not to prosec…

  • Prevention Of Organised Crime Act
  • Restraint Order
  • Ex Parte Application
  • Material Non Disclosure
  • Arbitrary Deprivation Of Property
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2024] ZAGPPHC 681

Rasegowa Trading and Projects CC and Another v Beyond Joint Venture (Pty) Ltd and Another (056029/2024)

Rasegowa Trading and Projects CC and Another v Beyond Joint Venture (Pty) Ltd and Another (056029/2024) [2024] ZAGPPHC 681 (11 July 2024)

The High Court confirmed an ex parte interim order after finding that a close corporation member was fraudulently removed and that reconsideration was unwarranted.

  • Corporate Control Dispute
  • Fraudulent Removal Of Member
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Ex Parte Application
  • Bank Account Access
  • Urgent-interdict
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] ZAGPJHC 1356

National Director of Public Prosecutions v Omar (021718/2022)

National Director of Public Prosecutions v Omar (021718/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1356 (22 November 2023)

The High Court dismissed a reconsideration application against a POCA preservation order over a truck, trailer, and cash, finding the truck and trailer were instrumentalities of the offence.

  • Prevention Of Organised Crime Act
  • Preservation Order
  • Instrumentality Of Offence
  • Ex Parte Application
  • Mandament Van Spolie
  • Poca-preservation-order
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2023] ZAGPJHC 1320

L.B.N v K.N - Ex Tempore (108047/2023)

L.B.N v K.N - Ex Tempore (108047/2023) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1320 (25 October 2023)

An urgent ex parte application for guardianship and relocation of a minor child to Qatar was dismissed because the biological mother was not cited or given notice.

  • Guardianship Of Minor
  • Relocation Of Child
  • Ex Parte Application
  • Notice To Interested Parties
  • Guardianship-of-minor
  • Child-relocation
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPJHC 236

N.J.M v NBC Holdings (Pty) Limited and Others (2021/55545)

N.J.M v NBC Holdings (Pty) Limited and Others (2021/55545) [2023] ZAGPJHC 236 (16 March 2023)

The High Court ordered an attorney to pay costs de bonis propriis after persisting with a moot application after settlement and repeated warnings.

  • Costs De Bonis Propriis
  • Punitive Costs Order
  • Ex Parte Application
  • Attorney And Client Scale
  • Costs-de-bonis-propriis
  • Punitive-costs
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2023] ZALCJHB 43

Mfebe v Minister Of Higher Education,Science And Technology and Others (J 1040/20)

Mfebe v Minister Of Higher Education,Science And Technology and Others (J 1040/20) [2023] ZALCJHB 43 (6 March 2023)

Labour Court costs ruling after ex parte contempt proceedings and a defective bid to file further affidavits. Each party bore its own costs on the ex parte matter.

  • Costs Award
  • Ex Parte Application
  • Contempt Of Court
  • Defective Application
  • Practice Manual Procedure
  • Labour-court-costs
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPPHC 64

Mhlongo v Farraque and Others (43344/21)

Mhlongo v Farraque and Others (43344/21) [2022] ZAGPPHC 64 (15 February 2022)

The High Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal, holding that the applicant had not shown reasonable prospects of success or another compelling reason.

  • Ex Parte Application
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Erroneous Payment
  • Dispute Of Fact
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Leave-to-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2021] ZASCA 142

National Director of Public Prosecutions (Ex Parte Application) (669/2020)

National Director of Public Prosecutions (Ex Parte Application) (669/2020) [2021] ZASCA 142; 2022 (1) SACR 1 (SCA) (7 October 2021)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that applications for preservation orders under section 38 of POCA are inherently urgent and do not require the applicant to establish urgency in the founding affidavit. The statutory framework of POCA and Uniform Rule 6(4)(a) provides for ex parte applications, and the practice directive of the Mpumalanga Division cannot override these provisions. The high court erred by treating the practice directive as having statutory force and by requiring the NDPP to make out a case for urgency. The appeal was upheld, and the NDPP was permitted to re-enroll the applicat…

  • Prevention Of Organised Crime Act
  • Preservation Order
  • Ex Parte Application
  • Urgency
  • Practice Directives
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.