Mathomomayo Investment Holding CC v Gainsford N.O and Others (Appeal) (HCAA18/2023)
Mathomomayo Investment Holding CC v Gainsford N.O and Others (Appeal) (HCAA18/2023) [2025] ZALMPPHC 127 (27 June 2025)
The Court found that the contract between the Appellant and the Fourth Respondent was divisible, with separate obligations arising for each batch of goods delivered and accepted. The Appellant made separate payments for delivered goods, demonstrating acceptance of the divisible nature of the contract. The Respondents only claimed payment for goods actually delivered and accepted, and there was no dispute regarding those deliveries. The defence of exceptio adimpleti non contractus was not applicable as the Respondents did not claim for goods not delivered. The Court further found that no mater…
Source excerpt
- Specific Performance
- Divisible Contracts
- Exceptio Adimpleti Non Contractus
- Dispute Of Fact
- Liquidation
- Counterclaim