Mantladi Technologies (Pty) Ltd v National Treasury and Others (033768/2022)
Mantladi Technologies (Pty) Ltd v National Treasury and Others (033768/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1168 (11 November 2024)
The applicant failed to establish that the National Treasury's decision was irrational or based on irrelevant considerations. Mantladi was non-compliant with the tender specifications, submitting woven items instead of non-woven ones and failing to provide required samples. The products of the successful bidders were confirmed to meet the tender requirements. The applicant did not demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting substitution or compensation under PAJA. The late amendment to the notice of motion was not justified, as no case was made for the new relief. Accordingly, the applic…
Source excerpt
- Public Procurement
- Judicial Review Under Paja
- Tender Award Challenge
- Exceptional Circumstances For Substitution
- Costs Award
- Amendment Of Notice Of Motion