Stols v Road Accident Fund (76180/2014)
Stols v Road Accident Fund (76180/2014) [2017] ZAGPPHC 142 (3 May 2017)
The court found that the plaintiff was driving at an excessive speed when approaching the roadworks, despite the reduced speed limit and visible signage. The plaintiff failed to maintain proper control and did not exercise the degree of care expected of a reasonable driver under the circumstances. The impact and severity of the accident, including the ejection of occupants and dislocation of a tyre, indicated that the plaintiff did not reduce his speed as claimed. The evidence of the defendant's witness was accepted as credible and provided a clear account of the accident. The court concluded…
Source excerpt
- Contributory Negligence
- Apportionment Of Damages Act
- Motor Vehicle Accident
- Standard Of Care
- Excessive Speed