Morwane v Kinnear and Others (2044/2017) [2024] ZANWHC 1 (5 January 2024)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
2044/2017
Judge
Mfenyana
The High Court refused a proposed amendment to particulars of claim, finding it introduced a new cause of action and would leave the pleading excipiable.
Mofokeng v Minister of Police (2017/22851) [2019] ZAGPPHC 79 (19 March 2019)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
2017/22851
Judge
Adams
The court found that the defendant's proposed amended plea sets out the material facts upon which the defence is based, specifically that the arresting officer reasonably suspected the plaintiff of having committed schedule 1 offences under the Criminal Procedure Act. The plea contains admissions regarding the circumstances of arrest and detention and pleads legal justification under section 40(1)(b). The court distinguished the Windvogel case, noting that in this matter, the defendant pleaded the factual basis for the arrest, unlike in Windvogel where only legal conclusions were pleaded. The…
Dlamini v R. Motors (NW04/2017) [2018] ZACONAF 1 (7 March 2018)
Court
Consumer Affairs Court
Case number
NW04/2017
Judges
J.Nkomo, P.Hlahane, K.Kgomongwe
The court granted the plaintiff’s application to join additional defendants and amend the pleadings, finding the proposed changes were permissible and not fatally excipiable.
Solid Build Contractors CC v Jacobs and Others (229/2017) [2017] ZAFSHC 62 (18 May 2017)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
229/2017
Judge
Snellenburg
Summary judgment was refused where the plaintiff knew of the defendants’ bona fide defence. The court granted leave to defend and ordered attorney-and-client costs.