Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAECMHC 37

Port St Johns Taxi Owners Association v MEC for Transport, Safety and Liaison Eastern Cape and Others (2021/2024)

Port St Johns Taxi Owners Association v MEC for Transport, Safety and Liaison Eastern Cape and Others (2021/2024) [2025] ZAECMHC 37 (13 February 2025)

The High Court dismissed an interdict application over taxi operations on the R61 route, finding no clear exclusive right, non-service on the Minister, and a genuine dispute of fact.

  • Final Interdict
  • Operator Permit Dispute
  • Service Of Process
  • Dispute Of Fact
  • Exclusive Rights
  • State Liability Act
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2016] ZAECPEHC 21

Pohl v Weyer (4226/15)

Pohl v Weyer (4226/15) [2016] ZAECPEHC 21 (10 May 2016)

The court found that the applicant held the exclusive right to provide radiography services at the Cath Lab under a written agreement with Life St George's Hospital. The respondent's right to work at the Cath Lab was derived from a joint venture arrangement with the applicant, not from any independent agreement with the hospital. The facts did not establish a partnership, as each party operated separate practices and did not share profits or expenses beyond the initial arrangement. The court held that the joint venture agreement was terminable on reasonable notice, which was given by the appl…

  • Joint Venture Termination
  • Implied Terms
  • Reasonable Notice
  • Exclusive Rights
  • Partnership Essentialia
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2011] ZAGPPHC 210

Motorsport South Africa v World of Motorsport ZA and Others (31885/11)

Motorsport South Africa v World of Motorsport ZA and Others (31885/11) [2011] ZAGPPHC 210 (18 November 2011)

The High Court dismissed Motorsport South Africa’s application for an interdict, finding it failed to prove a clear right on admissible evidence.

  • National Sport And Recreation Act
  • Interdict
  • Exclusive Rights
  • Admissible Evidence
  • Admissible-evidence
  • Statutory-interpretation
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1985] ZASCA 72

Putco Ltd. v TV & Radio Guarantee Company (Pty) Ltd.; TV & Radio Guarantee Company (Pty) Ltd. v Putco Ltd.; Putco Ltd. v TV & Radio Guarantee Company (Pty) Ltd.; TV & Radio Guarantee Company (Pty) Ltd. v Putco Ltd. and Others (1) (18404/1981, 18488/1981, 9937/1981, 5165/1982)

Putco Ltd. v TV & Radio Guarantee Company (Pty) Ltd.; TV & Radio Guarantee Company (Pty) Ltd. v Putco Ltd.; Putco Ltd. v TV & Radio Guarantee Company (Pty) Ltd.; TV & Radio Guarantee Company (Pty) Ltd. v Putco Ltd. and Others (1) (18404/1981, 18488/1981, 9937/1981, 5165/1982) [1985] ZASCA 72; [1985] 2 All SA 533 (A) (10 September 1985)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the agreement between Putco and TV & Radio Guarantee Company was a temporary interim arrangement, not intended to bind the parties indefinitely. The agreement was terminable on reasonable notice, and the inclusion of specific grounds for termination did not preclude termination by reasonable notice. The letter of 26 May 1981, while unequivocal, did not provide a reasonable period of notice, and thus did not validly terminate the agreement. The letter of 23 September 1981, providing six months' notice, was held to be a valid and reasonable notice of termin…

  • Termination Of Contract
  • Reasonable Notice
  • Exclusive Rights
  • Interdict
  • Costs Award
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.