Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2018] ZALCPE 2

Argent Steel Group t/a Sentech Industries v Motor Industry Bargaining Council and Others (PR150/14)

Argent Steel Group t/a Sentech Industries v Motor Industry Bargaining Council and Others (PR150/14) [2018] ZALCPE 2 (30 January 2018)

The Labour Court dismissed Argent Steel Group’s condonation and review applications over delay, inadequate consultation, and incoherent financial motivation for wage exemption.

  • Exemption From Collective Agreement
  • Condonation
  • Practice Manual Time Limits
  • Consultation Requirements
  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Labour-law
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2003] ZALC 75

Cape Manufacturing Engineers (Pty) Limited v Metal and Engineering Industries Bargaining Council (C 662/2002)

Cape Manufacturing Engineers (Pty) Limited v Metal and Engineering Industries Bargaining Council (C 662/2002) [2003] ZALC 75 (27 June 2003)

The Labour Court reviewed and set aside an appeal-board decision on a collective-agreement exemption, finding procedural unfairness and irrational reliance on extra information.

  • Exemption From Collective Agreement
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Main Agreement Interpretation
  • Labour-law
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2002] ZALC 37

Ncungama and Others v Bargaining Council for the Liquor, Caters and Accomodation Traders, South Coast, Kwazulu-Natal and Another (D608/2001)

Ncungama and Others v Bargaining Council for the Liquor, Caters and Accomodation Traders, South Coast, Kwazulu-Natal and Another (D608/2001) [2002] ZALC 37; [2002] 8 BLLR 766 (LC) (18 April 2002)

The Council's refusal to grant the applicants exemption from its Provident Fund Collective Agreement was procedurally unfair and substantively irrational. The Council failed to comply with the procedural requirements of Clause 14 by not providing written comments to the applicants, thereby denying them an opportunity to respond. The criterion for exemption, based on comparative benefits, was reasonable, but the Council misapplied it by disregarding evidence that the Hospitality Industry Provident Fund offered superior withdrawal benefits, which were material to the applicants' interests given…

  • Collective Bargaining
  • Exemption From Collective Agreement
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Freedom Of Association
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.