South Africa Case Law

Mehran v S (Appeal) (CA20/24)

Mehran v S (Appeal) (CA20/24) [2025] ZANWHC 79 (7 May 2025)

Court

North West High Court, Mafikeng

Case number

CA20/24

Judges

REDDY, WESSELS

The court found that the Section 10(2) certificate, although not verbatim to the Extradition Act, was sufficient to satisfy the statutory requirements for extradition, as established by Supreme Court of Appeal precedent. The affidavit presented by the State was admissible, with substantial compliance with the regulations regarding commissioners of oaths. The identity of the appellant was adequately established through multiple forms of evidence, including prior meetings, photographs, and video recordings. The extradition enquiry was not a criminal trial, and the procedural fairness afforded w…

Source excerpt

• Extradition Act
• Identity Of Accused
• Admissibility Of Affidavit
• Commissioners Of Oaths Regulations
• Section 10 Certificate
• Procedural Fairness

C.A.L.S v S (CA&R 66/2023)

C.A.L.S v S (CA&R 66/2023) [2025] ZANCHC 35; 2025 (2) SACR 174 (NCK) (17 April 2025)

Court

Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley

Case number

CA&R 66/2023

Judges

Tlaletsi JP, Stanton J

The court held that the appellant’s conduct—removing and retaining his minor children in South Africa without the mother’s consent and in breach of a US custody order—constitutes an offence under South African law, specifically contempt of court and contravention of section 305(1)(q) of the Children’s Act. This satisfies the requirement of dual criminality, as the conduct is punishable by imprisonment for six months or more in both jurisdictions. The section 10(2) certificate from the US authorities was properly accepted as conclusive proof of sufficient evidence for prosecution. The appellan…

Source excerpt

• Extradition Act
• International Parental Kidnapping
• Dual Criminality
• Child Abduction
• Contempt Of Court

Olalere v Director of Public Prosecutions North Gauteng (A61/2024)

Olalere v Director of Public Prosecutions North Gauteng (A61/2024) [2025] ZAGPPHC 9 (6 January 2025)

Court

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Case number

A61/2024

Judges

Engelbrecht, JJ Strijdom

The court held that the Extradition Act does not prohibit the commencement of extradition proceedings where criminal proceedings are pending or a sentence is being served in South Africa. Section 11(b) of the Act merely allows the Minister to delay surrender until local proceedings are concluded and any sentence served. The committal phase and serving of a local sentence may run concurrently, and there is no requirement to postpone extradition proceedings. The magistrate properly admitted arguments and concerns raised by Olalere's counsel, and there was no procedural unfairness or denial of t…

Source excerpt

• Extradition Act
• Committal Proceedings
• Fair Trial Rights
• Dual Criminality

Schultz v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and Others (76/2023)

Schultz v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and Others (76/2023) [2024] ZASCA 77; 2024 (2) SACR 294 (SCA) (23 May 2024)

Court

Supreme Court of Appeal

Case number

76/2023

Judges

Mothle, Hughes, Mabindla-Boqwana, Seegobin, Keightley

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the power to make an extradition request to a foreign State, specifically the United States, vests exclusively in the Minister of Justice as a member of the national executive. This conclusion is supported by the Constitution, the Extradition Act, and customary international law. The Court reasoned that extradition requests are acts of sovereignty between States and inherently implicate foreign relations, which are the preserve of the executive. The absence of express provisions in the Extradition Act regarding outgoing requests does not negate the Minist…

Source excerpt

• Extradition Act
• Executive Powers
• Separation Of Powers
• Customary International Law
• Ministerial Discretion
• Prosecutorial Independence

Britton v Minister of Justice & Correctional Services and Others (1349/18)

Britton v Minister of Justice & Correctional Services and Others (1349/18) [2023] ZAWCHC 155 (21 February 2023)

Court

Western Cape High Court, Cape Town

Case number

1349/18

Judge

M Sher

The Court held that it was bound by the Constitutional Court's decision in Smit, which declared section 5(1)(a) of the Extradition Act unconstitutional with prospective effect only. The applicant's arrest and the ministerial notification were issued before the Smit order and thus could not be retrospectively invalidated by this Court. The applicant's current restrictions stem from bail conditions, not ongoing arrest under the impugned provision. The ministerial notification and warrant were issued in substantial compliance with the Extradition Act and the treaty, and the Minister was not requ…

Source excerpt

• Extradition Act
• Separation Of Powers
• Constitutional Invalidity
• Prospective Vs Retrospective Orders
• Arrest And Detention
• International Extradition Treaty

Lewis-Springfield v S (CA&R40/2022)

Lewis-Springfield v S (CA&R40/2022) [2022] ZANCHC 54 (4 October 2022)

Court

Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley

Case number

CA&R 40/2022

Judge

Kgopa

The court found that the magistrate was empowered under section 9(2) of the Extradition Act to entertain bail pending extradition enquiry. The conduct alleged against the appellant, though termed 'International Parental Kidnapping' in the United States, corresponds to offences such as kidnapping, contempt of court, and child abduction under South African law, particularly given the existence of a custody order and the provisions of the Children’s Act and Hague Convention. The magistrate had sufficient information to consider the bail application, and the appellant failed to satisfy the court…

Source excerpt

• Extradition Act
• Bail Pending Extradition
• International Parental Kidnapping
• Child Abduction
• Hague Convention
• Contempt Of Court

Otubu v Director of Public Prosecutions, Western Cape (A54/2022; 16/750/2021)

Otubu v Director of Public Prosecutions, Western Cape (A54/2022; 16/750/2021) [2022] ZAWCHC 79; 2022 (2) SACR 311 (WCC) (16 May 2022)

Court

Western Cape High Court, Cape Town

Case number

A54/2022; 16/750/2021

Judge

G L Carter

High Court appeal against refusal of bail pending extradition was upheld. The court found the magistrate had treated the accused collectively rather than individually.

• Bail Application
• Extradition Act
• Criminal Procedure Act
• Presumption Of Innocence
• Cybercrime
• Interests Of Justice

Kouwenhoven v DPP (Western Cape) and Others (288/2021)

Kouwenhoven v DPP (Western Cape) and Others (288/2021) [2021] ZASCA 120; [2021] 4 All SA 619 (SCA); 2022 (1) SACR 115 (SCA) (22 September 2021)

Court

Supreme Court of Appeal

Case number

288/2021

Judges

Ponnan, Wallis, Schippers, Hughes, Kgoele

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that an extradition enquiry is a criminal proceeding for the purposes of section 310(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, based on the nature and character of the proceedings and their substantial similarities to criminal trials. The DPP is entitled to appeal a magistrate's discharge of a person sought for extradition on a question of law, and the accused is not entitled to notice or to participate in the formulation of the stated case. The court further held that the phrase 'committed within the jurisdiction' in section 3(1) of the Extradition Act refers to the…

Source excerpt

• Extradition Act
• Criminal Procedure Act
• Jurisdiction Of Requesting State
• Appealability Of Magistrate Decisions
• Statutory Interpretation
• International Criminal Law

Kouwenhoven v Minister of Police and Others (888/2020)

Kouwenhoven v Minister of Police and Others (888/2020) [2021] ZASCA 119 (22 September 2021)

Court

Supreme Court of Appeal

Case number

888/2020

Judges

Ponnan, Wallis, Schippers, Hughes, Kgoele

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that none of the grounds advanced by the appellant for invalidating his arrest or the warrant had merit. No binding undertaking was given by officials, and even if such an undertaking existed, it could not invalidate a judicial act such as the issue of a warrant. The affidavit supporting the warrant was properly attested in accordance with the regulations, and the commissioner of oaths had no disqualifying interest. The magistrate applied her mind to the application and issued the warrant lawfully; there was no evidence of rubber-stamping. Failure to notify th…

Source excerpt

• Extradition Act
• Commissioning Of Affidavits
• Judicial Review
• International Extradition
• Warrant Of Arrest
• Ministerial Notification

Director of Public Prosecutions, Western Cape v Tucker (CCT 85/20)

Director of Public Prosecutions, Western Cape v Tucker (CCT 85/20) [2021] ZACC 25; 2021 (12) BCLR 1345 (CC); 2022 (1) SACR 339 (CC) (6 September 2021)

Court

Constitutional Court

Case number

CCT 85/20

Judges

Mogoeng CJ, Jafta J, Khampepe J, Madlanga J, Mathopo AJ, Mhlantla J, Theron J, Tshiqi J, Victor AJ

The Constitutional Court held that a magistrate conducting an enquiry under section 10 of the Extradition Act is not obliged to receive evidence relevant solely to the Minister's surrender discretion under section 11, unless such evidence is also relevant to the jurisdictional facts for committal. The majority found that the High Court erred in ordering the re-opening of committal proceedings for the admission of evidence pertaining only to surrender, as this evidence is not admissible at the committal stage. The proper remedy for a person subject to extradition is to make representations dir…

Source excerpt

• Extradition Act
• Fair Trial Rights
• Ministerial Discretion
• Admission Of Evidence
• Judicial Review
• Audi Alteram Partem