Kekae v S (A282/17) [2024] ZAGPPHC 844 (26 August 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A282/17
Judges
Khumalo, Motha
The High Court set aside a rape and robbery conviction and sentence after key evidence was missing from the record and the appeal could not be fairly heard.
S v Mavuso (HC09/2024) [2024] ZANWHC 268 (7 June 2024)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
HC09/2024
Judges
Dibetso-Bodibe, AH Petersen
High Court review set aside an undefended accused’s theft conviction and sentence after finding multiple procedural irregularities in plea, mitigation, and firearm proceedings.
Makau v S (CA&R 02/2024) [2024] ZAECMHC 56 (4 June 2024)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha
Case number
CA&R 02/2024
Judges
Hinana, Makaula
The magistrate committed serious misdirections by failing to properly inform the appellant of his right to legal representation, not affording him adequate opportunity to secure counsel, and admitting exhibits without proper procedure. The magistrate's conduct, including direct communication with one legal representative in the absence of the other, undermined the fairness of the trial. The State's concession that the trial was unfair and the sentence harsh was correct. The cumulative effect of these misdirections resulted in a violation of the appellant's constitutional rights, rendering the…
The Supreme Court of Appeal upheld the appeal, finding no proof of dolus eventualis for fraud and holding that the unrepresented appellant had a fair trial.
S v Machubeni (REV59/2023) [2023] ZALMPPHC 59 (1 August 2023)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
REV59/2023
Judges
Kganyago, Makoti
The court found that the accused's right to legal representation was not properly respected, as the magistrate failed to confirm with the accused whether he wished to conduct his own defence and did not encourage him to seek legal representation. The magistrate relied solely on the prosecutor's statement and failed to conduct the necessary enquiry. Furthermore, the magistrate did not question the accused in terms of section 112(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act to ensure that all essential elements of the offence were admitted, resulting in a conviction based only on a general guilty plea.…
Willis v Mahadevy and Others (94037/19) [2021] ZAGPPHC 601 (17 September 2021)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
94037/19
Judge
TLHAPI VV
The High Court granted leave to appeal against summary judgment, finding reasonable prospects of success on issues of personal liability, fee agreements, and related factual disputes.
Botes v S (AR321/2019) [2020] ZAKZPHC 53 (11 September 2020)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Case number
AR321/2019
Judges
Chetty, Balton
The court found that the trial magistrate's failure to safeguard the appellant's right to legal representation, both by permitting his attorney to withdraw without proper enquiry and by refusing a reasonable postponement for the appellant to secure alternative representation, constituted a material irregularity. The subsequent lack of competent representation, including the failure to effectively cross-examine key witnesses, further prejudiced the appellant's right to a fair trial. The court held that these breaches of constitutional rights were sufficiently serious to vitiate the convictions…
Maluleke v Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services and Others (JR479/18) [2020] ZALCJHB 18 (31 January 2020)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Case number
JR479/18
Judge
Coetzee
The Labour Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal after holding that the review judgment showed no reasonable prospect of success or other compelling reason.