Mgcira v S (A282/2017)
Mgcira v S (A282/2017) [2018] ZAFSHC 60 (10 May 2018)
The court found that the appellant's version, that he purchased the operating license from another individual and had used it without prior issue, was reasonably possibly true. The magistrate erred by relying on incorrect legal submissions and failing to verify the relevant statutory provisions. The evidence did not establish that the appellant knowingly possessed a falsified document or committed fraud. The conviction and sentence were therefore not justified and had to be set aside.
Source excerpt
- Fraud
- Falsification Of Documents
- Operating License
- Public Transport Regulation