Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2014] ZASCA 40

Roshcon (Pty) Limited v Anchor Auto Body Builders CC and Others (49/13)

Roshcon (Pty) Limited v Anchor Auto Body Builders CC and Others (49/13) [2014] ZASCA 40; [2014] 2 All SA 654 (SCA); 2014 (4) SA 319 (SCA) (31 March 2014)

The court held that the supplier and floor plan agreements reserving ownership to Wesbank were genuine commercial arrangements serving a legitimate purpose of securing finance. There was no evidence of a secret understanding or simulation; the parties intended the agreements to operate according to their terms. Toit’s never acquired ownership of the trucks, as it failed to pay Wesbank, and thus could not transfer ownership to Roshcon. The reservation of ownership in favour of Wesbank was valid and enforceable. Roshcon failed to discharge the onus of proving simulation or estoppel, as Wesbank…

  • Simulated Transactions
  • Reservation Of Ownership
  • Estoppel
  • Floor Plan Agreements
  • Security For Finance
  • Ownership Of Movables
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2013] ZAGPPHC 300

Nissan Finance t/a Firstrand Bank Ltd v van Aarde (76065/09)

Nissan Finance t/a Firstrand Bank Ltd v van Aarde (76065/09) [2013] ZAGPPHC 300 (17 October 2013)

The High Court dismissed an application to attach a motor vehicle pending trial, finding the applicant had not shown a prima facie right of ownership.

  • Interim Interdict
  • Prima Facie Right
  • Authority To Institute Proceedings
  • Ownership Of Goods
  • Floor Plan Agreements
  • Interim-interdict
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2002] ZASCA 130

Absa Bank Ltd t/a Bankfin v Jordashe Auto CC (402/2001)

Absa Bank Ltd t/a Bankfin v Jordashe Auto CC (402/2001) [2002] ZASCA 130; [2003] 1 All SA 401 (SCA); 2003 (1) SA 401 (SCA) (27 September 2002)

The court held Absa had not proven ownership of the vehicles on the papers and rejected estoppel on the evidence available, referring key factual disputes to oral evidence.

  • Ownership Of Moveable Property
  • Estoppel
  • Simulation Of Contract
  • Delivery Of Goods
  • Floor Plan Agreements
  • Ownership-of-movable-property
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.