Roshcon (Pty) Limited v Anchor Auto Body Builders CC and Others (49/13)
Roshcon (Pty) Limited v Anchor Auto Body Builders CC and Others (49/13) [2014] ZASCA 40; [2014] 2 All SA 654 (SCA); 2014 (4) SA 319 (SCA) (31 March 2014)
The court held that the supplier and floor plan agreements reserving ownership to Wesbank were genuine commercial arrangements serving a legitimate purpose of securing finance. There was no evidence of a secret understanding or simulation; the parties intended the agreements to operate according to their terms. Toit’s never acquired ownership of the trucks, as it failed to pay Wesbank, and thus could not transfer ownership to Roshcon. The reservation of ownership in favour of Wesbank was valid and enforceable. Roshcon failed to discharge the onus of proving simulation or estoppel, as Wesbank…
Source excerpt
- Simulated Transactions
- Reservation Of Ownership
- Estoppel
- Floor Plan Agreements
- Security For Finance
- Ownership Of Movables