Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2019] ZACT 61

Competition Commission of South Africa v Uniplate Group (Pty) Ltd (CR188Nov15)

Competition Commission of South Africa v Uniplate Group (Pty) Ltd (CR188Nov15) [2019] ZACT 61 (27 June 2019)

The Tribunal found that Uniplate’s exclusive supply agreements with embossers unlawfully foreclosed rivals and contravened section 8(d)(i), imposing a penalty.

  • Abuse Of Dominance
  • Exclusive Dealing
  • Vertical Tying
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Market Definition
  • Foreclosure Effects
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2017] ZACT 43

Hesteel International Holdings Co. Limited and Others v Smart Union Resources (Hong Kong) Co. Limited (LM233Mar17)

Hesteel International Holdings Co. Limited and Others v Smart Union Resources (Hong Kong) Co. Limited (LM233Mar17) [2017] ZACT 43; [2017] 1 CPLR 302 (CT) (25 May 2017)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Hesteel’s acquisition of Smart Union Resources, finding no likely substantial competition harm or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Relationship
  • Foreclosure Effects
  • Public Interest
  • Iron Ore Market
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2013] ZACT 109

Imperial Car Imports (Pty) Ltd v Renault South Africa (Pty) Ltd (017582)

Imperial Car Imports (Pty) Ltd v Renault South Africa (Pty) Ltd (017582) [2013] ZACT 109 (31 October 2013)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Imperial Car Imports’ acquisition of an additional 11% in Renault South Africa, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Integration
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Foreclosure Effects
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 46

Imperial Holdings Ltd v Probe Corporation South Africa (Pty) Ltd (02/LM/Jan12)

Imperial Holdings Ltd v Probe Corporation South Africa (Pty) Ltd (02/LM/Jan12) [2012] ZACT 46 (29 June 2012)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Imperial Holdings’ acquisition of Probe Corporation South Africa, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Vertical Relationships
  • Foreclosure Effects
  • Public Interest
  • Market Definition
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2010] ZACT 8

Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd v Transfarm (Pty) Ltd and Others (68/LM/Oct09)

Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd v Transfarm (Pty) Ltd and Others (68/LM/Oct09) [2010] ZACT 8; [2009] 2 CPLR 483 (CT) (2 February 2010)

The Tribunal unconditionally approved Shoprite Checkers’ acquisition of Transfarm and related companies, finding no substantial lessening of competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Vertical Integration
  • Market Definition
  • Foreclosure Effects
  • Merger-control
  • Vertical-integration
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2005] ZACT 90

MTN Service Provider (Pty) Ltd and Cell Place (Pty) Ltd (83/LM/Sep05)

MTN Service Provider (Pty) Ltd and Cell Place (Pty) Ltd (83/LM/Sep05) [2005] ZACT 90; [2006] 1 CPLR 183 (CT) (20 December 2005)

The Competition Tribunal approved MTN Service Provider’s acquisition of Cell Place unconditionally, finding no substantial lessening of competition or public interest concern.

  • Vertical Integration
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Dealer Exclusivity
  • Foreclosure Effects
  • Barriers To Entry
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.