Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2018] ZANCHC 32

London and Others v Department of Transport Roads and Public Works of Northern Cape and Others (380/2012)

London and Others v Department of Transport Roads and Public Works of Northern Cape and Others (380/2012) [2018] ZANCHC 32 (22 June 2018)

The court found that the plaintiffs' particulars of claim did not establish a cause of action that could stand independently as a delictual claim. The claim was derivative in nature, and the plaintiffs failed to plead wrongfulness or unlawfulness necessary for a delictual claim. Although the Foss v Harbottle rule generally precludes shareholders from suing for losses suffered by the company, the court accepted that the rule is not absolute and may be relaxed where the risk of double recovery is non-existent, as in this case due to the liquidators' express indication not to pursue damages. How…

  • Exception To Particulars Of Claim
  • Derivative Action
  • Locus Standi
  • Rule 33 4
  • Wrongfulness
  • Foss V Harbottle Rule
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2011] ZAWCHC 392

Khan and Another v Communicare and Others (498/2010)

Khan and Another v Communicare and Others (498/2010) [2011] ZAWCHC 392 (21 October 2011)

The High Court held that retiring directors were entitled to vote at the AGM and that excluding them made the director elections invalid.

  • Company Articles Interpretation
  • Director Election Irregularity
  • Shareholder Voting Rights
  • Foss V Harbottle Rule
  • Personal Membership Rights
  • Company-law
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2009] ZAGPJHC 7

McCrae v Absa Bank Limited (08/42229)

McCrae v Absa Bank Limited (08/42229) [2009] ZAGPJHC 7 (7 April 2009)

High Court held that a shareholder’s personal claim was not barred at exception stage by the Foss v Harbottle rule where no double recovery risk was shown.

  • Foss V Harbottle Rule
  • Double Recovery
  • Duty Of Care
  • Shareholder Claims
  • Liquidation
  • Personal Delictual Claim
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.