Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2020] ZAECELLC 15

Mzayiya v Road Accident Fund (480/2020)

Mzayiya v Road Accident Fund (480/2020) [2020] ZAECELLC 15; [2021] 1 All SA 517 (ECL) (17 September 2020)

The court struck a Road Accident Fund default judgment application from the roll after finding repeated misstatements about the accident date and serious affidavit irregularities.

  • Default Judgment
  • Fraudulent Claim
  • Misrepresentation
  • Professional Conduct
  • Road Accident Fund
  • Amendment Of Pleadings
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2018] ZAGPJHC 569

Teichmann Structures (Pty) Ltd v Hollard Insurance Company Ltd and Another (24233/18)

Teichmann Structures (Pty) Ltd v Hollard Insurance Company Ltd and Another (24233/18) [2018] ZAGPJHC 569 (19 October 2018)

The applicant failed to prove that the outstanding amount of R2,129,876.62 was unrelated to the Advance Payment Guarantee and instead linked to an unsecured loan. The documents relied upon by the applicant, including IPC 13 and De Waal's email, did not support its version when read in context. The evidence showed that all advance payments were treated the same and recouped under the contract, with no distinction between secured and unsecured advances. The applicant's reliance on selective documentation and failure to provide proof of implementation of IPC 13 undermined its case. The court fou…

  • Performance Guarantee
  • Advance Payment Guarantee
  • Fraudulent Claim
  • Motion Proceedings
  • Interim Relief
Read case analysis
Delict [2015] ZAFSHC 139

Radebe v Road Accident Fund and Another (1897/2008)

Radebe v Road Accident Fund and Another (1897/2008) [2015] ZAFSHC 139 (9 July 2015)

The court dismissed the Road Accident Fund’s special plea, finding insufficient proof that the plaintiff had mandated attorneys to settle her claim.

  • Road Accident Fund Act
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Mandate Of Attorney
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Fraudulent Claim
  • Road-accident-fund
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2013] ZAKZDHC 34

Govender v New National Assurance Company Ltd (1737/2008)

Govender v New National Assurance Company Ltd (1737/2008) [2013] ZAKZDHC 34 (5 July 2013)

The High Court dismissed the insured plaintiff’s claim after finding that the alleged motor-vehicle hijacking did not occur on the evidence.

  • Insurance Contract
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Fraudulent Claim
  • Policy Conditions
  • Insurance-contract
  • Burden-of-proof
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2012] ZAGPJHC 298

Lloyds of London C/O Lloyds of South Africa v Baran Transport CC (18463/2010)

Lloyds of London C/O Lloyds of South Africa v Baran Transport CC (18463/2010) [2012] ZAGPJHC 298 (16 October 2012)

The High Court dismissed an insurer’s claim to recover a payout, finding it failed to prove the driver was drunk or that the claim form was fraudulently completed.

  • Insurance Contract
  • Exclusionary Clause
  • Fraudulent Claim
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Insurance-contract
  • Exclusion-clause
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2012] ZAGPJHC 191

Lloyds of London c/o Lloyds of South Africa v Baran Transport CC (18463/2010)

Lloyds of London c/o Lloyds of South Africa v Baran Transport CC (18463/2010) [2012] ZAGPJHC 191 (16 October 2012)

Insurer failed to prove intoxication or fraud and its claim for repayment was dismissed with costs.

  • Insurance Contract
  • Exclusionary Clause
  • Fraudulent Claim
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Insurance-contract
  • Exclusionary-clause
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2011] ZAFSHC 87

Road Accident Fund v Phillips (4701/2006)

Road Accident Fund v Phillips (4701/2006) [2011] ZAFSHC 87 (23 June 2011)

The court dismissed the Road Accident Fund’s bid to rescind a default judgment, finding no adequate explanation for the default and no bona fide defence.

  • Rescission Of Default Judgment
  • Condonation
  • Locus Standi
  • Duty Of Support
  • Customary Union
  • Fraudulent Claim
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2010] ZAECGHC 108

Buffalo City Municipality v Zinala Information Technologies and Communication System CC (179/2009)

Buffalo City Municipality v Zinala Information Technologies and Communication System CC (179/2009) [2010] ZAECGHC 108 (12 November 2010)

The court ordered Zinala to repay R880 654,12 after finding the payment to have been made without cause and rejecting the alleged services and tender.

  • Unjustified Enrichment
  • Fraudulent Claim
  • Municipal Tender Process
  • Restitution
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Unjust-enrichment
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.