Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Banking And Finance [2024] ZAWCHC 43

Africa Community Media (Pty) Ltd and Others v Standard Bank of SA Ltd - Application for Leave to Appeal (9318/2022; EC08/2023)

Africa Community Media (Pty) Ltd and Others v Standard Bank of SA Ltd - Application for Leave to Appeal (9318/2022; EC08/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 43 (19 February 2024)

The court found that the relief granted in September 2023 was not final in substance, despite its fixed duration, as it did not finally determine the parties' rights and allowed for further developments to be considered at a subsequent hearing. The order was not vague or arbitrary, as it clearly excluded statutory reporting obligations and did not prevent the bank from terminating accounts for reasons other than those stated in the termination letters. The applicants established a prima facie right to interim relief, particularly under section 22 of the Constitution, and conflicting decisions…

  • Interim Interdict
  • Bank Account Closure
  • Freedom Of Trade
  • Structural Interdict
  • Final Vs Interim Relief
  • Constitutional Rights
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2012] ZALCJHB 22

Contract Employment Contractors (Pty) Ltd v Motor Industry Bargaining Council (MIBCO) and Others (C 97/2012)

Contract Employment Contractors (Pty) Ltd v Motor Industry Bargaining Council (MIBCO) and Others (C 97/2012) [2012] ZALCJHB 22; [2012] 7 BLLR 726 (LC); 2013 (3) SA 308 (LC) (27 February 2012)

The court held that section 22 of the Constitution, read with section 8(4), may be interpreted to include juristic persons, particularly where the purpose of redress and the nature of the juristic person are considered. Even if the applicant is not entitled to rely directly on section 22, its concern for the rights of its employees brings the doctrine of objective unconstitutionality into play, allowing it to challenge the validity of the law. The applicant therefore meets the threshold required to resist absolution from the instance regarding standing. The point in limine is dismissed and th…

  • Standing
  • Freedom Of Trade
  • Collective Agreements
  • Objective Unconstitutionality
  • Section 22 Rights
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.