KAF and Others (14341/17), Ex parte
KAF and Others (14341/17), Ex parte [2017] ZAGPJHC 227 (10 August 2017)
The court found that the applicants failed to provide sufficient evidence that ND is not using surrogacy as a means of income, given her probable indigence and lack of full financial disclosure. The psychological assessment of ND was deemed inadequate and unsupported by the facts, raising concerns about her suitability and ability to cope with the psychological consequences of surrogacy. The involvement of Medfem Clinic and associated professionals posed a risk of commercialisation, with insufficient disclosure regarding their relationships and financial arrangements. The court emphasised the…
Source excerpt
- Surrogate Motherhood Agreement
- Children's Act Section 295
- Commercialisation Of Surrogacy
- Psychological Wellbeing Of Surrogate
- Full Disclosure In Ex Parte Applications