Z.D.P v Z.M (44209/19)
Z.D.P v Z.M (44209/19) [2024] ZAGPJHC 896 (16 September 2024)
The court found that the parties' acrimonious relationship and lack of compromise were detrimental to the best interests of the minor children. The removal of H[...] from formal schooling for religious reasons was not in line with her intellectual and social rights, but since the parties agreed to home schooling, the court endorsed this arrangement. The applicant retained the financial means to provide maintenance, and interim maintenance was necessary. The court rejected both parties' claims for contributions towards legal costs under Rule 43, holding that punitive costs are not contemplated…
Source excerpt
- Parental Responsibilities And Rights
- Interim Maintenance
- Home Schooling
- Contribution Towards Legal Costs