P.G v F.G (64222/2011)
P.G v F.G (64222/2011) [2014] ZAGPPHC 858 (23 October 2014)
The court found that the parties did not discuss or agree to limit the plaintiff's entitlement under the defendant's Liberty Life Lifestyle Plan (LLLP) to only the shortfall not covered by his medical aid. The language of clause 4 of the settlement agreement, read in context and considering the purpose of the agreement, did not support the defendant's contention of a limitation. The plaintiff's understanding that he would continue to enjoy the same benefits as before was reasonable and consistent with the parties' conduct and the wording of the agreement. The defendant's unexpressed intention…
Source excerpt
- Settlement Agreement Interpretation
- Hospital Plan Benefits
- Contractual Consensus
- Divorce Order Enforcement